Seizing the Moment: Preparing for Next Year with Groundwater Recharge Opportunities

Wednesday, Jul 21st, 2021

By David Guy

As water resources managers work hard this summer to deliver limited water supplies to cities, rural communities, farms, refuges and fisheries–while also providing essential hydropower for the state’s energy grid–there is increasing attention to prepare for the next water year. We previously wrote about Managing for Fish and Wildlife During a Dry Year in the Sacramento Valley, which will include efforts to help birds along the Pacific Flyway and reactivating our floodplains for fish and wildlife later this year. As we think about water management opportunities for next year, there is an increasing focus on groundwater recharge as an essential management tool to capture surface water when available and help bolster our critical groundwater supplies.

Although we cannot predict when we will see precipitation or any available surface supplies, now is the time to start preparing for that moment when we have available surface supplies. In this spirit, we urge the Governor and his administration to start preparing for this moment, including an Executive Order promoting groundwater recharge. This Executive Order can articulate a proactive vision by the administration to prepare for next year, plus it will recognize the challenges Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) are facing as they implement the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA).  An Executive Order will also show GSAs and their local landowners that state agencies are committed to supporting GSAs and are now further poised to provide additional tools to local agencies as they work to address these challenges. This includes the water budgets for Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs), where GSAs will be looking in many areas at groundwater recharge opportunities as an option to achieve balanced and sustainable groundwater conditions. State support and strategic investments in recharge opportunities over the next several years will help meet the SGMA objectives and ultimately save both time and resources for both DWR and the State Water Board as they carry out their SGMA responsibilities.

In the Sacramento Valley we learned from the efforts of Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District starting in 2014 that Governor Brown’s Executive Orders and Water Action Plan promoting groundwater recharge helped both spur and guide state agencies and their partnership with local entities that led to successful programs to recharge groundwater. We also believe an Executive Order would: 1) articulate a direct and clear state policy to promote groundwater recharge and storage, borrowing from sections 3.4 in the Water Resilience Portfolio; 2) prioritize state actions under section 3.5 to support and fund groundwater recharge projects, 3) advance the legislative intent in SGMA and show the Legislature and others that the administration is committed to successful implementation of this important legislation; 4) encourage DWR to continue providing support to local GSAs to implement SGMA, with an emphasis on groundwater recharge that protects aquifers, habitats and the economies they support; 5) provide additional support for the Flood-MAR program; 6) encourage state agencies to work with local agencies on the technical analysis necessary to help determine water availability for recharge projects; and 7) expedite permitting necessary for recharge projects.

In sum, groundwater recharge provides tremendous promise throughout the state and is an essential water management element as we look toward next year. We look forward to helping advance recharge opportunities and we would welcome your thoughts and ideas as we prepare for next year.

2 thoughts on “Seizing the Moment: Preparing for Next Year with Groundwater Recharge Opportunities”

  1. There is a water rights hearing coming up on August 12th for Nevada Irrigation District and Centennial Dam. South Sutter Water District is asking the state Water Resources Control Board to give them priority of water rights for Camp Far West. The friends of Bear River will stand up and state that the living ecology of Bear River deserves a water right. This water for Environmental services will flow all the way down Bear River to its confluence with the Feather River. At that point the water may be put into the North American sub basin via injection wells and settling ponds located on a 4,000 acre orchard or a gravel injection site along Bear River. This is a much better beneficial use and should be supported by the state of California when this hearing comes up.

  2. NASA confirms that water vapour is the most prominent GHG. It is responsible for 75% of global warming. In principle, we could reduce water vapour and thus require a less stringent reduction of CO2 .
    It would be a great advantage for DWR to look into the non-productive water component of available water in agriculture. The ITRC study has elaborated that 77% of precipitation water and 33% of irrigation water is lost to evaporation.
    The Earth Energy Imbalance associates water vapour as the largest contributor to global warming in the amount of 0.87 +/_0.15 W/m2.
    This simple number, EEI, is the most fundamental metric that the scientific community and public must be aware of as the measure of how well the world is doing in the task of bringing climate change under control. The change of heat radiation to space for a given greenhouse gas change can be computed accurately. The amount of
    CO2 in the atmosphere would need to be reduced from 410 to 353 ppm (i.e., a required reduction of ppm) to increase heat radiation to space by 0.87 W m , bringing Earth back towards energy balance (Fig. 8), where we have used the analytic formulae of Hansen et al. (2000) for this estimation. Atmospheric CO2 was last 350 ppm in the year 1988, and the global Earth surface temperature was then +0.5 C relative to the preindustrial period (relative to the 1880–1920 mean) (Hansen et al., 2017; Friedlingstein et al., 2019). see: Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2013–2041, 2020
    https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2013-2020

    A solution would be to reduce the water evaporation from soil on farmland. It is a sustainable solution. It is one that we have been able to demonstrate to conserve water in the soil, reducing the consumption of aquifers, reducing abiotic stress on crops, alleviating food security and reducing global warming. Improved Water management has the potential of sequestering carbon under the VM0042 methodology, improving the income of farmers, reducing the water risk exposure and advocating sustainable agriculture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *